Good People Don't Need Mentorship

By 20VC

Categories: VC, Startup

Summary

Top performers don't need mentorship or hand-holding—they self-direct and improve autonomously. This founder eliminates one-on-ones and formal reviews, providing real-time feedback only when correcting mistakes, arguing that people requiring heavy development aren't A-player material for high-performing teams.

Key Takeaways

  1. Eliminate formal one-on-ones and performance reviews for A-players. Provide feedback only in real-time via chat when correcting errors; positive performance doesn't require acknowledgment since top talent already knows they're respected.
  2. Use real-time feedback delivery (chat/immediate communication) instead of batched reviews. This creates accountability loops where high performers self-correct based on instant signals rather than waiting for formal cycles.
  3. Screen for self-directed talent during hiring. People who require extensive development and handholding aren't suited for A-player teams; filter these candidates out early rather than investing in mentorship later.
  4. Reframe mentorship as a signal of misalignment. If high-performing team members need constant guidance, they may lack the autonomy and ownership mentality required for your organization's standards.
  5. Trust replaces process in high-performing cultures. Instead of formal management structures, establish implicit respect signals that strong performers read and respond to without explicit verbal confirmation.

Topics

Transcript Excerpt

really good people figure out a way. They don't need a whole lot of mentorship. If people on my team, if they directly report to me, I never do one-on ones. I don't do reviews. If I don't like something they're doing, they know about in real time via chat. If I like what they're doing, they don't need to know. They know that I respect them and they're good to go. Good people don't need that type of handholding usually. And what ends up happening is people who need a lot of development do, those ...